SHORT COMMUNICATION
Typical Landscape Tree Species Recognition Based on RedEdge-MX: Suitability Analysis of Two Texture Extraction Forms under Random Forest Supervision
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Land and Tourism, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang, Henan Province, 471934, China
 
2
College of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia, 010019, China
 
 
Submission date: 2021-05-23
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-08-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-08-30
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-12-30
 
 
Publication date: 2022-02-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Huaipeng Liu   

Luoyang Normal University, City of Luoyang , Henan Province, China, 471934, luoyang, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022;31(2):1475-1484
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The window size of texture feature extraction has a significant impact on the accuracy of tree species classification. The forms of all texture features share an optimal extraction window, and different types of texture features use their independent optimal extraction windows, which is conducive to tree species classification. In this study, we used a RedEdge-MX image as the data source and a random forest to determine two forms of the best texture extraction windows and construct their own best texture feature set. Then, we combined the best texture feature sets with spectral bands and the digital surface model (DSM) to analyze the difference between the two best texture extraction forms in tree species classification. The results show that the classification accuracy of the best texture feature set was significantly different between the two extraction forms. The overall accuracy of the first extraction form was 79.6365% and that of the second extraction form was 81.8915%. When they are combined with a spectral band and the DSM, the classification accuracy of the latter was higher than that of the former (between 0.4295% and 2.2248%). Hence, in the classification of tree species, the construction of the best texture feature set should be determined by the best extraction window for each feature type.
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top