Introduction

Accompanied by the acceleration of urbanization, the problem of air pollution has become increasingly prominent [1, 2]. Population expansion, urban infrastructure construction, and industrial development have led to increased emissions of pollutant gases and rising pressure on the ecological environment. The contradiction between the people's growing demand for a beautiful ecological environment and the continuous deterioration of the ecological environment is prominent [3]. Urban and regional air pollution, represented by fine particulate matter (PM2.5), not only poses a great threat to public health but also damages the ecological environment, thus hindering the sustainable development of cities [4]. Therefore, it is important to study the temporal dynamic pattern of PM2.5 concentration in different regions, its spatial pattern distribution, and its interrelationship with various influencing factors in order to control air pollution, optimize the construction of the ecological environment, improve the human habitat, and build a healthy city.

At present, the study of the spatial and temporal distribution pattern of PM2.5 concentration and the exploration of its formation mechanism and influencing factors is one of the hotspots of atmospheric environment research [5]. Scholars at home and abroad on air pollution (PM2.5) research are mainly focused on source analysis [6], spatial and temporal evolution [7, 8], driving mechanisms [9], scenario simulation [10], and health evaluation [11, 12], and its influencing factors include meteorological factors, population density, land use, road traffic, topographic changes, and sources of pollution. They are gradually paying attention to the influence of landscape patterns on PM2.5 concentration. In terms of the spatial and temporal distribution and evolution of PM2.5, the study presents the diversification of data sources [13], the refinement of scales [14], and the diversification of methods [15]. Its different scales include national scales [16], regional scales [17], provincial scales [18], urban scales [19], etc. Specifically, in terms of the influence of population factors on PM2.5 concentration, the study focuses on population exposure risk to pollution sources, evolutionary pathways, and policy formulation [20], with population density [21] and population weighting [22] as the two main methods, and mostly using administrative districts as the research unit. Such studies are unable to characterize the severity of population exposure risk within refined spatial units [23], and there are some limitations in exploring the spatial heterogeneity of PM2.5 population exposure risk in depth. In contrast, the population exposure relative risk model can effectively quantify the degree of risk of population exposure to PM2.5 concentrations within a spatial unit [24]. It can more finely and accurately analyze the interrelationships between demographic factors and PM2.5 concentrations in a spatial unit. For example, Chen [25] compared air quality concentrations and population spatial distribution, proposed a population air pollution exposure assessment model, and then quantified the degree of population air pollution exposure within a spatial unit. Singh [26] differentiated the risk of population air pollution exposure on a fine scale by superimposing atmospheric pollutants and the spatial distribution of the population on the internal grid of the spatial unit, and some scholars have further discussed the impacts of landscape pattern factors on PM2.5 concentrations on the spatial unit from a geographic point of view. Some scholars further discussed the influence of landscape pattern factors on PM2.5 concentration from a geographic perspective, e.g., LIM A [27] found that PM2.5 concentration was positively proportional to the area of patches and the number of patches and inversely proportional to the average perimeter-area ratio and the average Euclidean distance. SHARMA D [28] and GHESHLAGHPOOR S [29] mainly investigated the relationship between particulate pollutant data and urban land use/cover characteristics, and the correlation between air pollutant distribution and concentration was found to be different from the spatial pattern of land use. MENGISTE B.M [30] found that the higher the degree of landscape dominance and the stronger the connectivity of patches, the more capable of reducing PM2.5 concentration through multiple linear regression analysis it is. McCarty [31] found that changes in landscape patterns would affect the spatial distribution of PM2.5 and increase the risk of exposure for the population by combining the correlation between the landscape pattern of the urban landscape and air quality analysis. It can be seen that the above studies focus more on the influence of single-factor changes on the spatial and temporal distribution and evolution of PM2.5 concentration. In correlation analysis, only population and landscape patterns are analyzed independently on the trend of spatial and temporal evolution of PM2.5 concentration, which does not fully reveal the spatial heterogeneity and mutual interference among factors and lacks the differences in the influence of multiple factors on PM2.5 at a fine scale. Therefore, it is particularly important to explore the coupling relationship between population, landscape pattern, and air pollution (PM2.5) in spatial distribution to further quantitatively analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of ‘Human-Air-Ground’ and its spatial heterogeneity at fine scales and to provide entry points and breakthroughs for the sustainable development of regional ecological environments.

Against this background, the author takes Hunan Province as the study area uses PM2.5 concentration data, population distribution data, and six-phase land-use type data from 2000 to 2020, and takes a 5 km × 5 km grid as the study unit. It introduces the relative risk model, the spatial auto correlation model, and the correlation coefficient method of population exposure to match population distribution at the scale of the refinement grid and the administrative district. By matching the population distribution, PM2.5 concentration, and landscape pattern indices at the scale of refined grids and administrative districts, we reveal the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the coupling relationship between ‘Human-Air-Ground’ and its spatial heterogeneity. In this paper, the following three aspects of the coupling relationship are investigated: ① Identify the characteristics of the spatial and temporal evolution of PM2.5 concentration in the study area under long time series; ② Explore the spatial and temporal evolution of PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk in the study area, and accurately identify the degree of PM2.5 population exposure risk; ③ Reveal the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the coupling relationship between ‘Human-Air-Ground’ and its spatial heterogeneity in the study area. The study results can provide a theoretical basis for mitigating atmospheric pollution, improving the human environment, optimizing the landscape pattern, and promoting ecologically sustainable development.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

Hunan Province is located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, at 24°39′N-30°08′N, 108°47′E-114°15′E (Fig. 1), with 13 prefectural-level cities, 1 autonomous prefecture, and 122 districts and counties, covering an area of 211,800 km2. The terrain is predominantly mountainous and hilly, with interspersed plains, basins, rivers, and lakes, and decreases in a gradient from west to east. Most of the study area has a subtropical monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 16-18 ℃ and an average annual rainfall of 1,200-1,700 mm. By the end of 2023, the resident population of Hunan Province will be 65.68 million, a year-on-year decrease of 0.5%; the gross domestic product (GDP) will be 50,012.09 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 4.6%; and the gross regional product (GDP) per capita will be 75,938 yuan, a year-on-year increase of 5.0%. The achievements in economic construction have also brought great challenges to air quality, the most obvious phenomenon of which is the frequent occurrence of haze weather, with PM2.5- based haze pollution problems being more prominent. The landscape pattern of the region is characterized by greater spatial heterogeneity and evolution due to the long-term combined effects of anthropogenic activities and social factors.

Fig. 1.

Study area extent and elevation.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_1_min.jpg

Data Source and Processing

The study’s main data includes digital elevation (DEM), administrative boundaries of Hunan Province, annual average concentration of PM2.5, population distribution, and land use types. Considering the need to maintain the consistency of the relevant data time period, every four years was chosen as the interval period, with a total of six data periods in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020. ArcGIS software was used to crop and extract the study area data according to the administrative boundaries and reclassify the land use types into cropland, forest land, shrubland, grassland, water bodies, bare land, and impervious surface. Due to the differences in the data resolution, the spatial resolution was resampled to 300 m to ensure spatial and temporal matching on a uniform coordinate system. The data sources and processing are shown in Table 1.

Methods

Population Exposure Risk

In order to scientifically quantify the risk of population exposure to PM2.5 pollution, this paper introduces the relative risk evaluation model of population air pollution exposure [32]. This is mainly to multiply the proportion of the population in each cell of the study area to the population of the whole area with the concentration of PM2.5 in the cell to obtain the contribution value of the cell to the risk of population exposure to PM2.5, and then add the contribution value of each cell of the study area to obtain the population-weighted concentration exposure index of PM2.5 in the study area. The contribution of each cell in the study area was then summed to obtain the population-weighted PM2.5 exposure indicator for the area. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

(1)
Ri=Pi×Ci∑i=1n(Pi×Cin)

Where: i - grid number; Ri - risk of population exposure to PM2.5 for the grid; Pi - number of people in the grid; Ci - PM2.5 concentration value within the grid; n - total number of grids.

Moving Window Method

In order to comprehensively reflect the spatial distribution characteristics of landscape patterns, with reference to previous studies [33, 34], landscape pattern indices, such as aggregation index (AI), the average area of patches (AREA_MN), patch density (PD), edge density (ED), shape index (LSI), and contagion index (CONTAG), as well as the proportion of patches in the landscape area (PLAND), were selected to characterize the landscape's connectivity, degree of fragmentation, structure, shape, and compositional characteristics. Since the landscape pattern is scale-dependent, choosing the appropriate scale can more accurately reflect the real situation of the landscape pattern; therefore, the window radius (km) was set to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 using Fragstats software. The semi-variance function in geostatistics was used to determine the optimal scale for the moving window. The ratio of the nugget value to the abutment value in the semi-variance function (nugget-base ratio) reflects the degree of spatial variability, and the smaller its value is, the more obvious the spatial autocorrelation is and the more stable the scale is. The optimal analysis scale is the window radius when the patch-to-basal ratio reaches relative stability [35, 36]. Under the continuous scale, the spreading index (CONTAG), patch density (PD), and shape index (LSI) were selected as the calculation objects, and sample strips were set up for sampling [37]. It was finally determined that the landscape pattern index tended to be stabilized at 5 km (Fig. 2), which indicated that this scale could better reflect the spatial heterogeneity of the landscape pattern.

Table. 1.

Data sources and processing.

TypeSourceDescriptionAccuracyProcessing method
Digital Elevation ModelGeospatial data cloudElevation, slope, and direction of slope30m×30mProjection, inlay, cutting
National Administrative BoundaryResources and Environmental Science Data CenterVector data on administrative boundaries of provinces, cities, and counties nationwide—Projection, consolidation
PM2.5 annual average concentrationNational Earth System Science Data CenterHigh-resolution, high-quality, year-on-year, month-on-month, and day-on-day PM2.5 data for China, 2000-20221 kmProjection, cropping
Population DistributionWorld pop datasetData on the spatialization of population in China, 2000-20201 kmProjection, cropping
Land use typeChina land cover datasetYear-by-year landscape type data for China, 1985-202030m×30mProjection, cropping
Fig. 2.

Trends in the spatial variability of landscape pattern indices.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_2_min.jpg

Spatial Autocorrelation

Global spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to measure the agglomeration between spatial units and neighboring units throughout the study area, and the global Moran's index was used to determine whether PM2.5 concentrations were spatially autocorrelated. The value of the global Moran index ranges from [-1,1], which is greater than 0 to indicate that there is a positive spatial correlation between PM2.5 concentration and its influencing factors, less than 0 to indicate that there is a negative spatial correlation, and equal to 0 to indicate that there is no spatial autocorrelation between the regions. Local spatial autocorrelation analysis is used to explore the degree of adjacent spatial correlation, detect the location of outliers or clusters, and determine the clustering of spatial units (districts and counties) of annual average PM2.5 concentrations based on the local Moran index [38]. The global Moran index (IG) and local Moran index (IL) are commonly used, and their expressions are as follows:

(2)
IG=n∑i=1n∑j=1nwij(xi−x¯)(xj−x¯)S2∑i=1n∑j≠1nwij,(i≠j)
(3)
S2=1n∑i=1n(xi−x¯)
(4)
x―=1n∑i=1nxi
(5)
IL=(xi−x―)∑j=1nwij(xj−x―)S2,(i≠j)

Where: n - total number of grids; S2 - variance of PM2.5 concentration of all grids; xi and xj - PM2.5 concentration of the ith and jth grids; x― - mean of all grid attributes; wij - spatial weights.

Land Use Dynamics

Land use dynamic attitude is the area ratio before and after the change of a certain type of land use type within a certain time range in the study area, which can reflect the change of land use in type, quantity, speed, and ecological quality in different periods [39]. In the paper, the land use dynamic index model was applied to dynamically analyze the changes in type, quantity, and speed in different periods in the study area. Its single land use dynamics can express the change of a certain land use type within a certain time range in a specific area, while the comprehensive land use dynamics can reflect the annual rate of change of all the land uses in the whole area. The specific model formula is as follows [40]:

Fig. 3.

Trend of annual average PM2.5 concentration in Hunan Province.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_3_min.jpg

Single land-use attitudes

(6)
Ds=Ub−UaUa×T−1×100%

Integrated land-use dynamics

(7)
Dc=(∑i,j=1nΔUij2∑i=1nUi)×T−1×100%,(i≠j)

Where: Ua and Ub - area of a land-use type (km2) at the beginning and end of the study period; Ui - area of a land-use type of type i (km2), ΔUij - absolute value of the area of land-use type i converted to type i during the study period (i ≠ j); T - length of the study (years).

Results and Discussion

Characteristics of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of PM2.5

Characterization of Temporal Heterogeneity

Analyzing the trend change of annual average PM2.5 concentration in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020, it is found that its annual average change has a certain volatility, and the whole is characterized by a slow increase and then a significant decline, reaching a maximum of 59.27 μg/m3 in 2007 and falling to a minimum of 28.05 μg/m3 in 2020. As can be seen in Fig. 3: PM2.5 concentration increased slowly from the initial 39.2 μg/m3 to 58.91 μg/m3 in 2000-2013, with an average annual growth rate of 3.59%; PM2.5 concentration decreased significantly from the initial 58.91 μg/m3 to 28.05 μg/m3 gradually in 2013-2020, with an average annual decrease rate of 13.7%. 55% of the years had annual average PM2.5 concentrations above 50 μg/m3, and up to 85% of the years had annual average PM2.5 concentrations exceeding the standard value of 35 μg/ m3. Although it dropped to below the maximum limit value (35 μg/m3), it was stipulated in the Ambient Air Quality Standard after 2018 [41] that it was still nearly twice as high as the international standard value (15 μg/ m3) [42-43]. This indicates that the pollution level is still relatively high in most parts of Hunan Province, and the pollution situation cannot be ignored.

Characterization of Spatial Heterogeneity

In order to reveal the characteristics of changes in the spatial distribution of annual mean PM2.5 concentration, it was divided into seven intervals of (15, 25), (25, 35), (35, 45), (45, 55), (55, 65), (65, 75), and (75, +∞) in conjunction with the international standard limit values (annual mean concentration of 15, 25, and 35 μg/ m3), with every 4 years as the interval period (Fig. 4). It can be seen that: (1) The overall spatial distribution was high in the northeast and low in the southwest. The spatial distribution patterns were generally similar in 2000, 2004, and 2008, with the region-wide annual mean concentration continuing to increase, the northeast region expanding significantly, and the southwest region relatively slow, especially in 2008, when the region-wide annual mean concentration reached more than 45 μg/m3. In 2012, 2016, and 2020, the region-wide annual mean concentration continued to decline, and the northeast region is significantly down compared with the southwest region, which is relatively slower, especially in 2020. The annual average concentration of the whole region reached 35 μg/m3 or less and is below the maximum limit of domestic air quality standards. However, there is still a gap from the target value.

Fig. 4.

Changes in the spatial distribution of annual average PM2.5 concentration in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_4_min.jpg

(2) There are obvious differences in the local spatial distribution; for example, in 2004, 2008, and 2012, the high-value areas (>45 μg/m3) were mainly distributed in Changsha, Xiangtan, Zhuzhou, Changde, Yueyang, and Yiyang; in 2016 and 2020, the areas with annual average concentrations of less than 35 μg/m3 in this urban agglomeration have increased significantly, and in particular, in 2020, the annual average concentration in the whole area will reach below 35 μg/m3.

Geoda software carried out the global spatial autocorrelation test of annual mean PM2.5 concentration in Hunan Province, and the global Moran's index was used to determine whether the annual mean concentration of different grids had spatial autocorrelation [44]. The Moran's index remained stable from 2000 to 2020, and all of them were over 0.8 (Table 2), which showed a significant positive autocorrelation in spatial distribution, indicating that the spatial distribution had agglomeration characteristics.

In order to further explore the spatial distribution characteristics of the annual average PM2.5 concentration, the local spatial autocorrelation test was carried out with the grid as the spatial unit. According to the degree of aggregation of high or low values in each grid, it is categorized into four spatial correlation patterns: high - high aggregation area, low - low aggregation area, high - low aggregation area, and low - high aggregation area [45]. As shown in Fig. 5, local spatial aggregation characteristics are obvious; the high - high aggregation area is mainly concentrated in all or part of the districts and counties of Changsha, Xiangtan, Zhuzhou, Changde, Yueyang, Yiyang, and Hengyang, which are located in the center of economic development of urban agglomerations, with flat terrain and urban concentration, active human activities, and aggregation of PM2.5 air pollutants. The low - low aggregation zone is mainly located in all or part of Yongzhou, Chenzhou, Huaihua, and Shaoyang, which are relatively socio-economically backward, with mountainous hills, high vegetation cover, and superior ecological environments conducive to the deposition and absorption of PM2.5 pollutants.

Table. 2.

Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of annual average PM2.5 concentration in Hunan province.

Parameters200020042008201220162020
Moran’s I0.8340.8100.8310.8410.8360.827
P-value0.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.001
Z-value14.863414.547814.818214.884514.844914.9690
Fig. 5.

LISA spatial clustering distribution of PM2.5 concentration in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_5_min.jpg
Fig. 6.

Percentage of population exposure to annual average PM2.5 concentration by zone in Hunan Province in a typical year.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_6_min.jpg

Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal

Evolution of the Risk of PM2.5 Population Exposure

Temporal Heterogeneity

The statistics and visualization of the percentage of the population exposed to PM2.5’s annual average concentration in each zone from 2000 to 2020 are shown in Fig. 6. (1) The mean percentage of the population exposed to high-concentration zones (>45 μg/m3) amounted to 74.24% in 2000-2016, while the mean percentage of the population exposed to more than 35 ug/m3 was as high as 96.5%. (2) Between 2016 and 2020, the proportion of the population in areas exposed to annual average PM2.5 concentrations (<35 μg/m3) increased year by year, from 6.86% to 73.02%; among them, in 2020, there was an area where the annual average PM2.5 concentration was located in the range of 15-25 μg/m3, with a proportion of 13.2% of the population, and there were no areas with more than 45 μg/m3.

Spatial Heterogeneity

In order to scientifically quantify the degree of risk of population exposure to PM2.5 concentration in a spatial cell (grid), systematic sampling was conducted according to a 5 km × 5 km grid with equal distances to extract the annual average PM2.5 concentration and the number of people at the sample points. The degree of risk of population exposure to PM2.5 concentration in a spatial cell was measured using the formula for population exposure risk in the previous section (Section 1.3). Combined with the existing literature [46, 47], the population exposure risk is categorized into six levels: low risk (0, 1), lower risk (1, 2), medium risk (2, 3), higher risk (3, 4), high risk (4, 5), and very high risk (5, +∞). As can be seen from Fig. 7, the spatial distribution of the risk level of PM2.5 population exposure in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020 is dominated by low risk, accounting for more than 70% of the total area, which is mainly distributed in the marginal cities and districts and counties, while the high-risk areas are mainly concentrated in the central urban agglomeration of Chang - Zhu - Tan. The rest is distributed in the form of a scattering point.

Using Geoda software to conduct a global spatial autocorrelation test of PM2.5 population exposure risk in Hunan Province, Moran's index remained stable and close to 0.5 from 2000 to 2020 (Table 3). This indicates a positive autocorrelation in the spatial distribution, suggesting that the spatial distribution of PM2.5 population exposure risk exhibits a clustering characteristic.

Analyzing the local spatial autocorrelation test of PM2.5 population exposure risk in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020 (Fig. 8), we found that the spatial correlation pattern is the same as the spatial clustering characteristics of PM2.5 annual average concentration (Section 2.1.2). The high - high aggregation area is distributed in a cluster shape, and the scope changes are small, mainly concentrated in the core area of Chang - Zhu - Tan city, which is fundamentally due to the urbanization and industrialization development triggered by the population concentration leading to the growth of PM2.5 emissions, and the high-risk area is concentrated in the city center, which exposes the population to the high-concentration range for a long period of time. The low - low concentration zones are mainly located in Yongzhou, Chenzhou, Huaihua, and Shaoyang, which are related to their hilly and mountainous location, high vegetation cover, small population size, slow industrialization, low socio-economic energy consumption, and low pollution emissions.

Fig. 7.

Change in the spatial distribution of PM2.5 population exposure risk level in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_7_min.jpg
Table. 3.

Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of PM2.5 population exposure risk in Hunan province.

Parameters200020042008201220162020
Moran’s I0.4930.4970.4950.4940.4960.496
P-value0.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.001
Z-value9.956310.088710.102310.138110.241410.3169
Fig. 8.

LISA spatial clustering distribution of population exposure risk to PM2.5 in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_8_min.jpg
Table. 4.

Area of each landscape type in Hunan Province in a typical year from 2000 to 2020 (km2).

200020042008201220162020
Cropland68360.2869678.7771928.5771998.0971964.4371490.33
Forest135576.98134219.27131734.65131192.06130411.89130813.31
Shrub242.17209.73149.7896.4568.5761.19
Grassland82.5967.7962.3667.8865.2057.58
Water5067.414871.514707.934690.514915.314466.80
Barren0.760.490.400.440.310.72
Impervious2475.392758.033221.893760.154379.864915.66

Characterization of Landscape Types

One needs to analyze the change in land use types to study the change in landscape pattern index. From Table 4, it can be seen that from 2000 to 2020, the area share of each land use type in Hunan Province is forest land > cultivated land > water body > impervious surface > shrubland > grassland > bare land, with cultivated land and forest land as the main land use types, with cultivated land accounting for 33.48% of the average annual area, forest land accounting for 62.47%, and the rest of the average annual area accounting for a smaller proportion. Overall, the cropland and impervious surface area showed an increasing trend, while the rest of the land use types showed a decreasing trend, with woodland decreasing the most.

Analyzing the dynamic changes in land use types (Fig. 9) reveals that the combined land use dynamics (Dc) during the five periods were 0.19%, 0.32%, 0.07%, 0.10%, and 0.11%. This data indicates a general trend of initial increase followed by a decrease. The characteristics of single land use dynamics vary across each period. Cropland dynamics were positive from 2000 to 2012, showing an increasing trend; however, they turned negative from 2012 to 2020, with the area decreasing year by year. Forest showed negative values from 2000 to 2016, indicating a continuous decrease in area, but turned positive from 2016 to 2020, starting to show an increase. Shrubland consistently exhibited negative dynamics, experiencing a continual decrease in the area across all periods. Both grassland and water followed a similar pattern, showing positive dynamics only from 2008 to 2012 and 2012 to 2016 and negative dynamics otherwise, resulting in an overall decrease in area. Barren saw a sharp increase in 2016-2020, marked by positive dynamics, although its area as a percentage of the total remained so small that the change was negligible. Impervious consistently showed positive dynamics across all periods, continuing to increase across the total area.

Analysis of the Coupling Relationship Between ‘Human-Air-Ground’

The correlation coefficient method can be used to analyze the correlation between landscape indices, and the t-test is used to verify the degree of significance of the correlation relationship between landscape indices [48]. The significant degree of correlation relationship was analyzed for several landscape pattern indices selected in the previous section (Section 1.3), and the results were as follows: (1) The correlation relationship between edge density (ED) and the shape index (LSI) was stronger in significant degree, and the correlation relationship between the shape index LSI and the other indices was more pronounced: therefore, the edge density (ED) was retained. (2) The aggregation index (AI), the average patch area (AREA_MN), and cohesion (COHESION) all characterize the structural features of the landscape category, but the average patch area (AREA_MN) and cohesion (COHESION) have strong correlations with the other indices, so the cohesion index (AI) is retained; (3) The proportion of the landscape area accounted for by the patches (PLAND) and the density of patches (PD) have a strong correlation, but PD is weakly correlated with other indices and can contain more information, so PD is retained. In order to further analyze the coupling relationship between “people, air, and land”, the landscape pattern indices were selected as Aggregation Index (AI), Patch Density (PD), and Edge Density (ED).

Fig. 9.

Comparison of attitudes towards movement by landscape type in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020.

https://www.pjoes.com/f/fulltexts/197055/PolJEnvironStud-2026-35-1-777-794_Fig_9_min.jpg

By analyzing the changes in land use types in the above (section 2.3), it can be seen that cropland and forest land, as the main land use types, have relatively obvious changes in dynamics and attitudes; water bodies and impervious surfaces come second; and the remaining types account for a very small proportion of the total and can be neglected. Therefore, we focus on analyzing the coupling relationship of ‘Human-Air-Ground’ among cropland, forest land, water bodies, and impervious surfaces. According to Table 5, it can be realized:

The aggregation index (AI) and edge density (ED) of cropland were positively correlated with the annual average concentration of PM2.5 and the risk of population exposure, while the patch density (PD) was negatively correlated. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of the changes in the average annual concentration of PM2.5 and the risk of population exposure: it was found that from 2000 to 2020, the cultivated area and the average annual concentration of PM2.5 and the risk of population exposure showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing. This was mainly concentrated in all or part of the districts and counties of Changde, Yueyang, and Yiyang, as well as the edge of the Chang - Zhu - Tan urban agglomeration, etc., and the area with a high average annual concentration of PM2.5 and the risk of population exposure was high and localized in the space. The autocorrelation aggregation characteristics of this region are all characterized as high - high aggregation areas. The high degree of patch aggregation, high edge density, and low fragmentation of cultivated land will lead to an increase in the annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk. The effect of cropland on PM2.5 annual mean concentration and population exposure risk has a significant seasonal effect. During the growing period, the vegetation adsorption capacity can slowly stagnate the dust and reduce the PM2.5 concentration in the air, while the bare ground and straw burning during the harvesting and planting period can produce large dust, which will increase the PM2.5 concentration.

Edge Density (ED) and Patch Density (PD) of woodland were positively correlated with the annual mean concentration of PM2.5 and population exposure risk, while the Aggregation Index (AI) was negatively correlated. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of changes in the mean annual concentration of PM2.5 and population exposure risk: it was found that the area of forest land showed a decreasing and then increasing trend in relation to the mean annual concentration of PM2.5 and population exposure risk, which was mainly concentrated in all or part of the counties and districts of Yongzhou, Chenzhou, Huaihua, and Shaoyang. The low mean annual concentration of PM2.5, the low population exposure risk, and the autocorrelation aggregation characteristics of the local space are manifested in the low - low aggregation area. The high degree of patch aggregation, low edge density, and low degree of fragmentation of woodland are conducive to reducing annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk. The main reason why woodland can effectively reduce PM2.5 concentration is that concentrated and complex-shaped plant leaves can adsorb and immobilize particulate matter, reduce atmospheric particulate matter concentration, lower the risk of population exposure to PM2.5, and improve air quality.

The Aggregation Index (AI), Edge Density (ED), and Patch Density (PD) of water bodies and impervious surfaces were all positively correlated with the annual average concentration of PM2.5 and population exposure risk. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of changes in the annual average concentration of PM2.5 and population exposure risk finds that the area of water bodies decreased year by year, the area of impervious surfaces increased year by year, and both of them were mainly concentrated in all or part of the districts and counties of Changde, Yueyang, and Yiyang and the center of the Chang - Zhu - Tan urban agglomeration. The region with a high annual average concentration of PM2.5 and a high risk of population exposure and the characteristics of the local spatial autocorrelation aggregation were all manifested as a high - high aggregation area. Higher aggregation of water bodies and impervious surfaces, higher density of edges, and more complex fragmentation result in higher annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk. Therefore, the increase of impervious surfaces and the decrease of water bodies will increase the risk of PM2.5 annual average concentration and population exposure, and the reasonable control of impervious surfaces extension edge zone and fragmentation degree can effectively mitigate PM2.5 pollution and reduce the risk of population exposure.

Table. 5.

Correlation coefficients of the coupling relationship between ‘Human-Air-Ground’.

Landscape TypeLandscape pattern indexPM2.5 Annual Average ConcentrationPM2.5 Population Exposure Risk PM2.5
200020042008201220162020200020042008201220162020
CroplandAI0.712**0.766**0.713**0.701**0.735**0.762**0.731**0.725**0.717**0.710**0.707**0.705**
ED0.449**0.508**0.431**0.413**0.446**0.456**0.677**0.665**0.614**0.627**0.658**0.656**
PD-0.378**-0.458**-0.400**-0.422**-0.495**-0.533**-0.342**-0.378**-0.368**-0.379**-0.434**-0.430**
ForestAI-0.810**-0.855**-0.805**-0.782**-0.825**-0.861**-0.832**-0.834**-0.845**-0.850**-0.856**-0.867**
ED0.189*0.1720.1000.0690.0690.0700.358**0.293**0.198*0.1670.1750.197*
PD0.528**0.565**0.475**0.464**0.524**0.577**0.677**0.666**0.639**0.640**0.664**0.680**
ShrublandAI-0.551**-0.598**-0.653**-0.587**-0.568**-0.493**-0.527**-0.484**-0.571**-0.479**-0.445**-0.395**
ED-0.757**-0.810**-0.783**-0.748**-0.779**-0.717**-0.730**-0.720**-0.713**-0.667**-0.667**-0.628**
PD-0.764**-0.817**-0.786**-0.756**-0.778**-0.742**-0.738**-0.729**-0.714**-0.671**-0.677**-0.654**
GrasslandAI-0.466**-0.363**-0.356**-0.459**-0.240**-0.286**-0.395**-0.312**-0.242**-0.375**-0.208*-0.236**
ED-0.530**-0.494**-0.445**-0.467**-0.436**-0.433**-0.469**-0.313**-0.230*-0.296**-0.323**-0.315**
PD-0.537**-0.526**-0.490**-0.479**-0.535**-0.488**-0.452**-0.331**-0.266**-0.281**-0.394**-0.368**
WaterAI0.228*0.224*0.231*0.300**0.316**0.244**-0.0110.0100.0050.0710.1120.083
ED0.695**0.680**0.656**0.638**0.646**0.645**0.491**0.444**0.434**0.425**0.408**0.403**
PD0.688**0.704**0.661**0.620**0.639**0.622**0.595**0.548**0.545**0.530**0.502**0.446**
BarrenAI0.0450.0140.0190.022---0.032-0.037-0.030-0.027--
ED0.0630.0010.0020.0990.0900.0970.0140.014-0.0290.1310.1340.135
PD0.0630.0010.0020.0990.0900.0980.0140.014-0.0290.1300.1330.136
ImperviousAI0.204*0.0810.186*0.232*0.204*0.1710.0500.0560.1300.198*0.204*0.209*
ED0.439**0.574**0.486**0.450**0.522**0.599**0.738**0.774**0.762**0.767**0.791**0.808**
PD0.364**0.538**0.404**0.337**0.426**0.519**0.678**0.721**0.685**0.671**0.692**0.706**

[i] ​Note: * and ** are significant correlations at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels (two-tailed), respectively.

Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal

Evolution of the Risk of PM2.5 Population Exposure

In the context of green development, sustainable development is the top priority of urban construction. PM2.5, as an important indicator of urban green development, is closely related to industrial production, industrial structure, and road transportation networks. The author takes the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of PM2.5 annual average concentration and population exposure risk as an entry point to analyze the correlation between the landscape pattern index and PM2.5 annual average concentration and population exposure risk. The annual average concentration of PM2.5 in Hunan Province from 2000 to 2020 has been slowly increasing and then significantly decreasing, and the year 2013 is the turning point of the decrease, which is mainly caused by two aspects: first, the 2012 Eighteenth National Congress of the Party of China (CPC) set a new target to increase the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in Hunan Province, and the second one is to decrease the average concentration in Hunan Province. First, the 18th Party Congress in 2012 listed “ecological civilization construction” for the first time in the overall layout of the socialist cause with Chinese characteristics and launched various strategic deployments for ecological civilization construction. Second, the Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Air Pollution issued by the State Council in 2013 clearly stated that practical and effective measures should be taken to strengthen ecological civilization construction and optimize industrial structure to alleviate the atmospheric environmental problems with PM2.5 as the characteristic pollutant. The spatial distribution is high in the northeast and low in the southwest. The high-value area is concentrated in the Chang - Zhu - Tan area, with rapid economic development and a high urbanization level, which indicates that PM2.5 is closely related to economic development, industrial structure, and industrial energy. The spatial distribution characteristics of the annual average concentration of PM2.5 and the risk of exposure of the population have consistency, with a significant positive autocorrelation in the global space and obvious clustering characteristics in the local area. The high-value area and the low-value area of both of them coincide spatially, which is in agreement with the spatial distribution of PM2.5, spatially coinciding, which is consistent with the findings of Fu [49]. The high urbanization level, large population base, and rapid industrial development in the high-value area all lead to an increase in PM2.5 emissions, exposing the population to a high-risk area for a long time, while the low-value area has a complex hilly terrain, a high vegetation cover, a small population base, a slow industrialization development, and low socio-economic energy consumption, which results in a low level of risk of population exposure to PM2.5.

Analysis of the Association Between Different Types of Landscape Patterns and the Risk of Population Exposure to PM2.5

The landscape pattern index is a quantitative index reflecting the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the landscape, which can accurately extract the characteristics of the landscape pattern and is currently the most direct and effective research method in the analysis of spatiotemporal dynamics of the landscape pattern [50]. Using the optimal moving window method to explore the correlation between landscape patterns and annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk can improve the scientific validity of the research results. A large number of studies have shown [51, 52] that different land use types have a significant effect on PM2.5 concentration, and changes in landscape type are correlated with population exposure risk to a certain extent. By analyzing the dynamic attitude of land use, it was found that the strength of the correlation of the landscape pattern index was consistent with the corresponding single dynamic attitude change, indicating that the degree of change in land use type has an impact on the landscape pattern, which in turn affects the annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk [53]. Similar to the results of other studies, landscape types such as woodland, shrubs, and grassland were negatively correlated with annual mean PM2.5 concentrations, mainly attributed to green plants’ ability to effectively adsorb particulate matter in the air, thereby reducing air pollution. Cultivated land, on the other hand, showed a positive correlation with PM2.5 concentration, contrary to some studies’ results [54]. Among them, related scholars found that arable land has a “source” and “sink” phenomenon on PM2.5 concentration, not only as a type of vegetation cover adsorption of stagnant dust but also in the harvesting and sowing seasons due to the surface of the bare dust. The results of the present study confirm that arable land is more likely to exacerbate the PM2.5 concentration of the air and is likely to exacerbate PM2.5 air pollution. The positive correlation between the landscape pattern index of water bodies and PM2.5 is different from the results of some studies [55], while the present study confirms that water bodies act as a long time series of pollutant retention, which leads to high air pollutant concentration levels around the water bodies in the form of pollutant sources. Regional economic development, urbanization, and industrialization have increased the complexity and fragmentation of bare land and impervious surface land patches, leading to higher annual average concentrations of PM2.5. HART R [56] and BENCHRIF A [57] assessed that population exposure risk is closely related to the human habitat and that environmental risk assessment is important for improving urban construction and social equity. Like the PM2.5 correlation, the landscape index of woodland, shrub, and grassland green space sites showed a significant negative correlation with population exposure risk. Overall, the correlation between impervious surface and exposure index was greater than that of other sites, indicating that the impact of urban construction is stronger than other factors [58].

Conclusions

In this paper, the landscape pattern index, annual average PM2.5 concentrations, and population exposure risk of different land use types at the fine grid scale in Hunan Province are studied. The population exposure risk model, moving window method, spatial autocorrelation model, and correlation analysis are used to explore the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk from 2000 to 2020. It reveals the characteristics of the spatial and temporal evolution of the “people-air-land” coupling relationship and its spatial heterogeneity in the study area. The spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the coupling relationship between ‘Human-Air-Ground’ and its spatial heterogeneity were revealed. The results show that:

(1) From 2000 to 2020, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in Hunan Province as a whole shows a slow increase and then a significant decrease; the spatial distribution is high in the northeast and low in the southwest, and the high-value areas (PM2.5 > 45 μg/m3) are mainly located in Changsha, Xiangtan, Zhuzhou, Changde, Yueyang, Yiyang, and so on. This is a high - high agglomeration area located in the center of the urban agglomeration's economic development, with flat terrain and concentrated cities where human activities are active. It is located in the center of the economic development of urban agglomerations, with flat terrain and concentrated cities, active human activities, and aggregation of PM2.5 air pollutants. The low - low aggregation zone is mainly distributed in all or part of districts and counties, such as Yongzhou, Chenzhou, Huaihua, and Shaoyang, which are relatively backward in terms of socio-economics and forested with mountainous hills, with high vegetation coverage and superior ecological environment, which is conducive to the deposition and absorption of PM2.5 pollutants.

(2) From 2000 to 2016, Hunan Province was exposed to PM2.5 annual average high concentration areas (>45 μg/m3), accounting for 74.24% of the average value. From 2016 to 2020, the proportion of the population in the areas exposed to PM2.5 annual average low concentration values (<35 μg/m3) increased year by year, from 6.86% to 73.02%. In particular, 2020 appeared to be when the PM2.5 population share of areas with annual average concentrations in the range of 15-25 μg/m3 is 13.2%, and there are no areas above 45 μg/ m3. The risk of PM2.5 population exposure in the spatial distribution is dominated by low risk, accounting for more than 70% of the total area, which is mainly dispersed in the fringe cities and districts and counties in Hunan Province, as a low - low aggregation area, which is related to its location in the mountainous and hilly areas, high vegetation coverage, small population size, slow industrialization, low socio-economic energy consumption, and low pollution emissions. The high-risk areas are mainly concentrated in the Chang - Zhu - Tan urban agglomeration center. The region has a scattered heterogeneous distribution, has a high - high aggregation area, is the root of urbanization and industrialization development, and has led to the growth of PM2.5 emissions so that the population is exposed to a high concentration range for a long time.

(3) Cultivated land and forested land, as the main land types in Hunan Province, are characterized by relatively obvious changes in dynamics and attitudes; water bodies and impervious surfaces are the second most common; therefore, we focused on analyzing the correlation between the landscape pattern indices of cultivated land, forested land, water bodies, and impervious surfaces and the risk of population exposure to the annual average PM2.5 concentration and population exposure. Among them, a high degree of patch aggregation, high edge density, and low degree of fragmentation of cropland led to higher annual mean PM2.5 concentration and population exposure risk, and the correlations of patch aggregation and edge density were stronger than those of fragmentation. Higher levels of patch aggregation, lower edge densities, and lower levels of fragmentation in woodlands contribute to lower PM2.5 annual mean concentrations and population exposure risk, and the levels of patch aggregation and fragmentation are more strongly correlated than edge densities. Higher aggregation, higher edge density, and more complex fragmentation of water bodies and impervious surfaces resulted in a higher risk of PM2.5 annual mean concentrations and population exposure, and edge density and fragmentation were more closely correlated than patch aggregation.