ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Research on Evaluation System of Forest
Park Rehabilitation Landscape Environment
Based on AHP – Take Jigong Mountain
Bolden Forest Park as an Example
1
Academy of forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
2
Leicester International Institute, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning124221, China
3
School of science and technology, Xinyang University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
4
Suqian Institude of Urban Planning and Design Company Limited, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, China
Submission date: 2023-10-19
Final revision date: 2024-01-24
Acceptance date: 2024-05-13
Online publication date: 2024-09-11
Corresponding author
Hui Wang
Academy of forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
Academy of forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
[Objective] This study aims to construct a scientific and rational evaluation system for
the rehabilitation landscape of forest parks, providing a better foundation for the planning and
design of rehabilitation landscapes in forest parks. [Methods] The GST method and AHP method
were used to select and calculate the evaluation indices for the rehabilitation landscape of forest
parks. The internal visitors were selected as the research subjects, and questionnaires were randomly
distributed to score various indicator elements of the rehabilitation landscape in forest parks.
[Results] (1) 25 representative and objective indicators were selected through gray selection, while 8 indicators were not selected due to their lack of direct relevance or low measurability in the evaluation of rehabilitation landscapes in forest parks. (2) The weight order of the criterion layer was as follows: Psychological Health B3 (0.385), Landscape Safety B2 (0.297), Physiological Health B4 (0.176), Landscape Comfort B1 (0.142). (3) The highest degrees of importance in each indicator layer were: Landscape Spatial Scale (0.237) in Landscape Comfort B1, Spatial Layout (0.357) in Landscape Safety B2, Mental Relaxation (0.372) in Psychological Health B3, Disease Prevention (0.327) in Physiological Health B4. (4) The comprehensive score of the rehabilitation landscape in Bolden Forest Park was 3.924, with a rating of “good”. The scores and rating levels for each individual indicator were as follows: The comprehensive score of Psychological Health was 4.081, with a rating of “excellent”, the highest among the four dimensions; the comprehensive score of Landscape Comfort was 3.810, with a rating of “good”; the comprehensive score of Landscape Safety was 3.967, with a rating of “good”; and the comprehensive score of Physiological Health was 3.602, with a rating of “good”.
[Conclusion] The overall rehabilitation landscape effect of Bolden Forest Park is at a good level, which reflects to a certain extent the characteristics of the current rehabilitation landscape in forest parks.
[Results] (1) 25 representative and objective indicators were selected through gray selection, while 8 indicators were not selected due to their lack of direct relevance or low measurability in the evaluation of rehabilitation landscapes in forest parks. (2) The weight order of the criterion layer was as follows: Psychological Health B3 (0.385), Landscape Safety B2 (0.297), Physiological Health B4 (0.176), Landscape Comfort B1 (0.142). (3) The highest degrees of importance in each indicator layer were: Landscape Spatial Scale (0.237) in Landscape Comfort B1, Spatial Layout (0.357) in Landscape Safety B2, Mental Relaxation (0.372) in Psychological Health B3, Disease Prevention (0.327) in Physiological Health B4. (4) The comprehensive score of the rehabilitation landscape in Bolden Forest Park was 3.924, with a rating of “good”. The scores and rating levels for each individual indicator were as follows: The comprehensive score of Psychological Health was 4.081, with a rating of “excellent”, the highest among the four dimensions; the comprehensive score of Landscape Comfort was 3.810, with a rating of “good”; the comprehensive score of Landscape Safety was 3.967, with a rating of “good”; and the comprehensive score of Physiological Health was 3.602, with a rating of “good”.
[Conclusion] The overall rehabilitation landscape effect of Bolden Forest Park is at a good level, which reflects to a certain extent the characteristics of the current rehabilitation landscape in forest parks.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
