ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Reproductive Allocation Strategy of Two
Herbaceous Invasive Plants Across
Different Cover Classes
Congyan Wang1,2, Jiawei Zhou1, Jun Liu1, Lei Wang1, Hongguang Xiao1
More details
Hide details
1Institute of Environment and Ecology, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University,
Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China
2State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Nanjing, 210008, P. R. China
Submission date: 2016-04-16
Final revision date: 2016-07-15
Acceptance date: 2016-07-15
Online publication date: 2017-01-31
Publication date: 2017-01-31
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2017;26(1):355-364
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Plant invasion succeeds because of such invader characteristics as fecundity and high-efficiency
multiple reproduction modes. The acquisition of individual resources and the benefits of individual fitness
are driven by optimum patterns of life history and trade-offs of reproductive allocation (RA) in plants, and
variations in RA strategy play an key role in plant adaptation to environmental changes. Thus determining
the RA strategy of invasive plants is important for understanding the successful mechanism underlying plant
invasion. This study aims to determine the reproductive allocation (RA) strategy of two herbaceous invasive
plants (Conyza canadensis and Solidago canadensis) across different cover classes in eastern China. Plant
height, maximum branch length, the reproductive branch number, aboveground biomass, the amount of
reproductive investment, and the coefficient of RA of the two plants decreased with increasing cover class
(although the changes were not pronounced). Thus the two plants may decrease physiological investment
on reproductive behavior and reduce RA under competitive conditions because of interspecies competition
that progressively decreased and intraspecific competition that gradually increased with increasing cover
class. The RA of the two plants may be principally influenced by plant community composition at low
cover classes, but by soil pH at high cover classes. This may be the outcome that soil pH of the two plants
decreased with increasing cover class significantly. Thus, intraspecific competition for resources may play
an important role in the RA strategy of the two plants under high cover class.