ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Influence of In-situ Soil and Groundwater Level
on Hydrological Effect of Bioretention
More details
Hide details
1
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Henan University of urban construction,
Longxiang Avenue, Xinhua District, Pingdingshan 467000, China
2
China Railway 10th Bureau Group Investment Development Co., Ltd, China Railway Caizhi Industrial South Road,
Lixia District, Jinan 250001, China
3
Pingdingshan Highway Development Center, Jiaotong building, Chang’an Avenue,
Xinhua District, Pingdingshan 467000, China
Submission date: 2022-01-08
Final revision date: 2022-03-05
Acceptance date: 2022-03-07
Online publication date: 2022-05-20
Publication date: 2022-07-12
Corresponding author
Junkui Pan
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Henan University of urban construction, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022;31(4):3745-3753
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Bioretention is an important technology for ecological control of runoff. The purpose of this
study was to investigate the coupling effect of in-situ soil and groundwater level on the hydrological
performance of bioretention. VADOSE/W was used to simulate the water transport processes during
bioretention under a single rainfall event. The effects of four in-situ soil types and two groundwater
levels on the surface ponding, underdrain outflow, exfiltration, and runoff regulation effects of
bioretention were studied. Under eight geological situations and the rainfall of 0.17 mm/h (6.0 h), the
ponding duration and overflow volume of bioretention were 556-649 min and 24.71-39.61 mm/m2,
respectively; the underdrain outflow peak value and duration were 0.549-0.804 mm/min and
380-730 min, respectively; the exfiltration volume per unit area from the bottom and lateral
of bioretention were 106.79-396.10 mm/m2 and 50.60-147.45 mm/m2, respectively; and the runoff
reduction rate, runoff peak reduction rate, and runoff delay time of bioretention were 53.46%-96.19%,
18.43%-68.08%, and 288-318 min, respectively. These results suggest that bioretention without an
underdrain and with a relatively smaller Ks (saturated permeability coefficient) of in-situ soil might
result in longer ponding times and larger overflow volumes. With an increase in Ks of in-situ soil, the
underdrain outflow weakens, the exfiltration volume increases, and the runoff control effects improve.
Although the groundwater level has little effect on surface ponding, it can cause a stronger underdrain
outflow. The shallower groundwater level leads to a larger exfiltration volume when the Ks of in-soil
is much smaller than that of the planting layer and leads to a reduced runoff regulation effect for
bioretention without an underdrain. Therefore, when locating and designing bioretention systems, the
in-situ soil type and groundwater level should be comprehensively considered to ensure that the runoff
control target is achieved.