ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effect of Vallisneria spiralis on Water Quality
and Sediment Nitrogen at Different Growth Stages
in Eutrophic Shallow Lake Mesocosms
More details
Hide details
1
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Submission date: 2020-05-29
Final revision date: 2020-09-09
Acceptance date: 2020-09-09
Online publication date: 2021-01-29
Publication date: 2021-03-08
Corresponding author
Wei Liang
Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(3):2341-2351
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Submerged macrophytes are commonly highlighted as the key step to restore eutrophic shallow
lakes. However, how submerged macrophytes affect water quality and sediment nitrogen at different
growth stages remains unclear. In this study, the dynamics of water quality, sediment nitrogen, and
denitrification during the four growth periods of Vallisneria spiralis (V. spiralis), namely, the rapid
growth period (stage I), stable growth period (stage II), withering and death period (stage III), and
decay and decomposition period (stage IV), were investigated using mesocosms to simulate eutrophic
shallow lakes. The results showed that the purification effects of V. spiralis on water quality parameters
in the four periods clearly differed. Compared with the control group (in the absence of V. spiralis),
the treatment group presented a lower concentration of Chlorophyll a (Chl.a) in stage I; total nitrogen
(TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), and Chl.a in stage II; and TN, total phosphorus (TP), chemical
oxygen demand (COD), and Chl.a in stage III. However, the water quality in stage IV deteriorated for
a short-period in the group with V. spiralis, especially the increases in NH4+-N and Chl.a. Moreover,
the effect of V. spiralis on the forms of nitrogen in sediment primarily occurred from stages II to IV.
The content of sediment TN in treatment group was much lower than that in control group, with a
final decrease of 40.7%. In addition, the denitrification rate (DNR) differed significantly between the
two groups, and the DNR in treatment group increased by 4.8 % compared with that in the control
group. The DNR of treatment group decreased in stage I but increased in stages II and IV. Our study
provides empirical evidence that re-established submerged macrophytes can contribute differently to
eutrophication mitigation in shallow lakes at their various growth stages.