ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effect of Substrate Ratio on Soil’s Water-Holding
Capacity and Shrinkage
More details
Hide details
1
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China
Submission date: 2022-04-27
Final revision date: 2022-06-13
Acceptance date: 2022-06-27
Online publication date: 2022-09-13
Publication date: 2022-11-03
Corresponding author
Wenju Zhao
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022;31(6):5461-5469
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In order to explore the effect of substrate ratio on soil’s water-holding characteristics and soil
shrinkage, the soil of Lanzhou New Area (China) was selected as the test soil, while pure soil was used
as the control group (CK). Four kinds of mixed substrates T1 (1:1:1), T2 (1:1:2), T3 (4:2:4), T4 (3:3:4)
were prepared by mixing mushroom residue, cow dung and vermiculite in different volume ratios. The
characteristic curves of the moisture in soil for different substrate ratios were constructed and fitted
with Van Genuchten and Brooks-Corey models. The influence of substrate ratios on soil hydraulic
parameters was systematically studied, and the soil’s water-holding capacity and shrinkage for various
treatments were analyzed. The results showed that, compared with CK, the T1, T2, T3 and T4 treatments
significantly improved the soil saturated water content, field water-holding capacity and effective water
content in the study area within the suction range of 0-7000 cm. Moreover, the T2 treatment had
a significant effect on soil effective water content. The soil’s water-holding capacity of the five
treatments was found to lie in the following descending order: T1>T2>T4>T3>CK. Furthermore, VG-M
(m, n), VG-M (1-1/n, n), BC-M, VG-B (m, n), VG-B (1-2/n, n) and BC-B could fit the characteristic
curves of the moisture in soil for the five treatments. Among them, the VG model could be used as the
optimal model to fit the characteristic curves of the moisture in soil for the five treatments at the same
time. With the soil dehydration, the soil’s effective linear shrinkage rate increased with the increase of
suction, whereas the two had a good logarithmic relationship. Additionally, the addition of substrate was
found to be effective. The soil’s shrinkage was inhibited. The study provides a theoretical basis for the
improvement of soil’s physical properties and ecological restoration in arid areas.