ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effect of Bronsted Base on Topological Alteration
of Rice Husk as an Efficient Adsorbent
Comparative to Rice Husk Ash for Azo Dyes
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
2
Central Laboratory Complex, University of Veterinary and Animal Complex, Lahore, Pakistan
3
Department of Pharmacology, Central Park Medical College
4
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, UVAS, Lahore, Pakistan
5
Department of Physiology, the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
Submission date: 2019-07-19
Final revision date: 2019-09-06
Acceptance date: 2019-09-14
Online publication date: 2020-02-28
Publication date: 2020-04-21
Corresponding author
Rahat Naseer
university of veterinary and animal sciences Lahore, IBBt, Pakistan
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020;29(4):2795-2802
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Rice husk (RH) is a notable fraction of lingo-cellulosic waste of paddy rice, abundantly available
in rice-producing countries. In the last few years, rice husk ash, one of the processed products of
the husk, has gained attention as an adsorbent. The present study the first time elucidates the adsorption
kinetics of sodium hydroxide-treated rice husk, without recovering the dissolved sugars, onto cationic
dye. The goal of the study was to investigate the implications of the alkali treatment on rice husk
composition and structure and to compare its adsorption potential with rice husk ash. The effects of
different concentrations of a base (2%, 4%, and 6%) and temperatures (25ºC, 70ºC, and 100ºC) were
considered. Surface modification was assessed utilizing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), followed by adsorption studies of malachite green
using chemically modified rice husk (MRH) and rice husk ash (RHA). The results showed that even
a mild treatment (4% NaOH) produces visible changes in the topology and bond vibrations. Although
similar trends were observed in the case of adsorbent MRH and RHA, adsorbent I (MRH) proved
to be an efficient adsorbent as compared to adsorbent II (RHA). MRH and RHA followed the pseudo
second-order of reaction. The R2 value for RHA (0.8619 and 0.838) and MRH (0.038 and 0.987)
in Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms suggested that RHA follows the principle of monolayer, whereas
MRH shows the heterogeneity of binding sites.