ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Does Environmental, Social, and Governance
Performance Affect Corporate Green
Innovation? Evidence from China
More details
Hide details
1
School of Entrepreneurship, Wuhan University of Technology
2
Economics and Management School, Wuhan University
Submission date: 2024-02-15
Final revision date: 2024-02-28
Acceptance date: 2024-04-18
Online publication date: 2024-09-13
Publication date: 2025-01-28
Corresponding author
Mei Li
Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(3):2273-2283
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
With the increasing emphasis on sustainable development worldwide, the innovative behavior of
corporations is being gradually influenced by the changing times. Responsible innovation means that
companies will increase their focus on environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) and base their
green innovation on this. It is worth further studying whether ESG advantages will enhance a corporation’s
green innovation. This article explores the impact of ESG advantages on corporate green innovation
and their mechanisms based on stakeholder theory and incentive theory. Using publicly manufacturing
corporations in China from 2003 to 2022 as samples, this study measures ESG through corporate
environmental certification and social responsibility reports, green innovation through Green invention
patents, financing constraints through financing costs, green investment behavior through environmental
investment, and validates the hypotheses using a multidimensional fixed effects model. Firstly, this
study finds that ESG advantages significantly promote corporate green innovation. Secondly, this study
finds that it exerts influence through the mechanisms of alleviating financing constraints and increasing
environmental protection investment. Finally, heterogeneity tests reveal that the impact of ESG advantages
on green innovation is more pronounced in technology-leading companies and state-owned corporations.
This study explains the pivotal role of responsible companies in achieving green technology leadership
and providing policy implications for promoting China’s economic transformation and upgrading, as well
as achieving high-quality development and demonstrating responsible great power globally. It also aims to
realize a community with a shared future for mankind, balancing the legitimate concerns of other countries
while pursuing its interests and promoting the common development of all countries.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
LU Y., CAO W., LIU X. Research on Sustainable Green Development Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Games from the Perspective of Environmental Regulations and Digital Technology Subsidies. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (6), 5227, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
2.
ZHUO C., CHEN J. Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122378, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
4.
BALACHANDRAN S., HERNANDEZ E. Networks and innovation: Accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads. Organization Science, 29 (1), 80, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2....
5.
LUO X., DU S. Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Marketing Letters, 26, 703, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002....
6.
MCWILLIAMS A., SIEGEL D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.2307/259398.
7.
FLAMMER C. Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (10), 1469, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.23....
8.
ZHOU K.Z., GAO G.Y., ZHAO H. State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62 (2), 375, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000183....
9.
FENG M., CHEN Y. Impacts of Heterogenous Environmental Regulations on Green Innovation of New Energy Firms: Empirical Evidence from China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (6), 5029, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
10.
ZHAO R., REN Z. Does Digital Economy Promote Enterprise Green Innovation? Evidence from Listed Heavy-Polluting Enterprises in China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (5), 4919, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:20431683.
11.
LIU Y., WANG X., ZHANG S. The Influence of Marketization Process on Enterprise Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32 (3), 2719, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:22574257.
12.
NING S., JIE X., LI X. Institutional Pressures and Corporate Green Innovation; Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31 (1), 231, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:19547286.
13.
CHENG C., CHU Y., DENG Z., HUANG B. Venture capital and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 75, 102208, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcor....
14.
ZAHRA S.A. A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (1), 20, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgra....
15.
FROST T.S., ZHOU C. R&D co-practice and 'reverse' knowledge integration in multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6), 676, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgra....
16.
CAGGESE A. Financing constraints, radical versus incremental innovation, and aggregate productivity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11 (2), 275, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20....
17.
CHI Y., HU N., LU D., YANG Y. Green investment funds and corporate green innovation: From the logic of social value. Energy Economics, 119, 106532, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
18.
JIN B., GARCÍA F., SALOMON R. Inward foreign direct investment and local firm innovation: The moderating role of technological capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 50 (5), 847, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267....
19.
WU J., WANG C., HONG J., PIPEROPOULOS P., ZHUO S. Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development. Journal of World Business, 51 (2), 251, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.....
20.
CHRISTENSEN D.M., SERAFEIM G., SIKOCHI A. Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97 (1), 147, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-20....
21.
BROADSTOCK D.C., MATOUSEK R., MEYER M., TZEREMES N.G. Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
22.
LI C., BA S., MA K., XU Y., HUANG W., HUANG N. ESG rating events, financial investment behavior and corporate innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 372, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....