ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Comparative Analysis of Characterization
Methods of Potential Environmental Pollution Risk
from Livestock and Poultry Breeding
More details
Hide details
1
Ocean College of Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China
2
College of Telecommunications and Information Engineering, Nanjing
University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China
Submission date: 2018-04-22
Final revision date: 2018-05-03
Acceptance date: 2018-05-07
Online publication date: 2019-01-09
Publication date: 2019-03-01
Corresponding author
Bojie Yan
Department of Geography, Minjiang University, Department of Geography, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China, 350108, 350108 Fuzhou, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019;28(4):2483-2489
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on statistics data of livestock and poultry of Guangdong Province, seven characterization
methods were used to characterize potential environmental pollution risk of livestock and poultry
breeding (LPB) of Guangdong and were analyzed comparatively. The results showed that the results
of different characterization methods of potential environmental pollution risk of LPB were generally
uneven in spatial distribution. The maximum value of seven characterization methods of potential
environmental pollution risk of LPB were all in Shunde District, but the minimum value of seven
characterization methods of potential environmental pollution risk of LPB were in different counties.
In addition, the number of counties exceeding the safety thresholds also had large differences among
different characterization methods of potential environmental pollution risk of LPB. The maximum
number, second number, and minimum number of counties exceeding safety thresholds was by
the alarm value of pig manure equivalent load of farmland calculated by nitrogen (AVPMELFN),
livestock density (LD), and the pig manure equivalent load of farmland calculated by phosphorus
(PMELFP), which accounting for 82.22%, 53.89%, and 11.11% of total counties, respectively. It showed
that the most stringent method was the AVPMELFN followed by the LD, and the least stringent
method was the PMELFP.