ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Amino Acid Modified Bentonite Clay
as an Eco-Friendly Adsorbent for Landfill
Leachate Treatment
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment,
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
3
Environmental Engineering Division, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran, Iran
Submission date: 2019-10-08
Final revision date: 2019-11-21
Acceptance date: 2019-11-21
Online publication date: 2020-06-30
Publication date: 2020-08-05
Corresponding author
Shahriar Ghammamy
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020;29(6):4089-4099
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Bentonite was modified by intercalation of amino acids into its interlayer space. Different amounts
of L-glutamic acid were added to bentonite and its effect was investigated on the reduction of landfill
leachate contamination. In the best result, the effect of pH adjustment on the structure and performance
of the modified clay was studied. The composite was characterized by various techniques such as FTIR,
SEM, XRD, TGA, and BET. Batch experiments were performed to evaluate the factors influencing
leachate chemical oxygen demand (COD) and turbidity removal efficiency. The effect of surfactant
loading amount, contact time, pH, and adsorbent dosage was evaluated. Under optimum conditions, the
maximum COD and turbidity removal rates for row clay were 40.1% and 63.8%, respectively, but they
were 65.7% and 92.1% for amino acid-modified clay under pH adjustment conditions, respectively. Also,
the results showed that the adsorbent produced in pH adjustment conditions had higher efficiency for
leachate treatment than the synthesized adsorbent under non-pH adjustment conditions. Under optimum
conditions, the percentage of COD and turbidity removal for modified clay under pH adjustment was
65.7% and 92.1%, respectively, while they were 61.3% and 89.9% for non-pH adjustment, respectively.