ORIGINAL RESEARCH
A Comparative Assessment of Three Pollen Substitutes for Honey Bee (Apis Mellifera L.) During Winter and Spring
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Arid Land Agriculture (Plant Protection Science Program); College of Agri. & Food Sciences. King Faisal University; P.O Box 55073, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia
 
2
Honey bee Research Section, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
 
3
Department of Economic Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
 
 
Submission date: 2024-03-12
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-11-18
 
 
Corresponding author
El-Kazafy A. Taha   

Department of Economic Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt, Egypt
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Pollen satisfies the nutritional requirements for developing honey bees, and without pollen, there is no brood development. Beekeepers feed colonies pollen substitutes or pollen supplements to stimulate brood rearing in the winter and early spring, or when pollen from blooming plants is scarce. The performance of honey bee colonies has been enhanced by supplementation with pollen substitutes. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of three pollen substitutes in maintaining the colony strength during winter and improvement of colony performance during the winter and spring seasons. The three diets consisted of 30 g peeled white lupine flour + 20 g brewer’s yeast + 20 g casein milk powder + 20 g honey + 10 g sugar powder (diet 1), 30 g fenugreek flour + 20 g brewer’s yeast + 20 g casein milk powder + 20 g honey + 10 g sugar powder (diet 2), and 30 g defatted soybean flour + 20 g brewer’s yeast + 20 g casein milk powder + 20 g honey + 10 g sugar powder (diet 3), and were provided to the experimental colonies in a paste form and compared with the unfed colonies. Diet 1 was the most accepted and consumed diet by honey bee workers during the winter and spring seasons. Colonies fed on diet 1 stored pollen, reared worker brood, and had adult population sizes larger than colonies fed on diet 2, diet 3, and unfed colonies. Colonies fed on diet 1, diet 2, and diet 3 produced more honey than the unfed colonies by 125.00%, 95.00%, and 70.00%, respectively. Diet 1 could be recommended to feed honey bee colonies during winter and spring to sustain the strength of the colonies and improve their productivity.
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top